1. Whole lung lavage is the treatment of choice, first described by Ramirez in 1965
Tolerated because rapid alveolar fluid clearance (53% within the first hour) Chestnutt et al
Improved FVC, TLC, PaO2 at rest and with exercise
Improved DLCO, A-a gradient and shunt
Other reported: decreased LDH, gradual radiographic clearing, improved V/Q
Complications: long anaesthetic time, hypoxemia, hydrothorax, bronchoconstriction, pneumonia, and electrolyte disturbances, complications of cardiopulmonary bypass if it is utilized.
Outcome: 60% good response with 2 lavages per lung, < 10% non-responders (Shah, 2000, Thorax)
It is unknown what differentiates those that responded to WLL and those that did not.
and how to proceed with WLL?
WLL is indicated when respiratory symptoms impair the quality of life or lung function deteriorates (Claypool et al, 1984, Chest). Kariman et al, (1984, Chest) suggested proceeding with WLL if n =23 (lavage if Pa02 < 70 mmHg, or P(A-a) > 40 mmHg) based on sample size of 23 patients.
More severely lung lavaged first, if both affected (L) lavaged first because right has larger volume and better ventilatory capacity, second lung lavaged 3-7 d later (Costabel, 2000, Eur Resp Mon)
reported to have WLL (2 kg) without ECMO (Moazam et al, 1985, J Peds
Manual percussion during the instillation and evacuation improves qualitative yield (better optical density of removed fluid) (Hammon, 1993, Chest)
Manual ventilation for 20 tidal breaths during second half of drainage procedure, allowed better drainage (Bingisser, 1998, Chest)
Other variations: Using ECMO:
Adults (n=5) unilateral lung lavage;
One case Bilateral sequential whole lung lavage with venovenous ECMO (Cohen, 2001, Chest), other reports of adults having sequential lavages
(n=3) bilateral whole lung lavage with ECMO (Mahut et al, 1992, Peds Pulm) Liquid ventilation (one case report in an infant) (Tsai et al, 1998, Peds Pulm). Hyperbaric oxygen (Jansen et al, 1987, Chest)
Trypsin - segmental lavage - adults (Nagasaka et al, 1996, Thorax)
Naturally occurring molecule
Hematopoetic effects on multiple cell lines, stimulates proliferation and differentiation of multiple cells: white blood cells
Side effects: Mild 20-30%: local reactions, fever, myalgias, headaches, flu-like. Severe <2%: Anaphylaxis, cardiac failure, leaky capillary syndrome.
Daily subcutaneous injections, dose: 5-10 ug/kd/d iv/sq
Case reports of treatment with GM-CSF in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis in adults: - reasonable efficacy (n=1) (Seymour, 1996, NEJM)
1/3 responded (Schoch, 1998, Eur Respir Journal)
1/1 responded (Barraclough, 2001, Thorax)
Clinical trials: small n
open label, 3 patients out of 4 total responded (Kavuru, 2000, AJRCCM)
4/8 responded (Thomassen, 2000, Clinical immunology)
6/14 responded (Seymour, 2001, AJRCCM)
better response in older, longer time since dx, normal LDH, higher SP-B level
Limited experience in children in this setting.
) PAP - Prognosis in Children
The following page provides data on the reported cases. The authors have not been contacted for further information. All the information available in the articles is presented. Infants appear to have a worse prognosis. Spontaneous resolution has been reported in children, but the details of these children are not known , nor the factors that make spontaneous resolution more likely.
SUMMARY PAP and SP-B very different diseases
SP-B deficiency: poor prognosis without lung transplant, refractory to treatment, role of gene therapy in the future
PAP: variable outcome, younger patients have a poorer prognosis
whole lung lavage is the treatment of choice
? role of GM-CSF experimental
reported reoccurrence after lung transplant
THIS CASE IN RETROSPECTWith this patient HRCT may not have helped in making the diagnosis of PAP as the findings were not classical. We are considering the possibility of starting GM-CSF therapy for this patient.
Discussions raised during the case presentation were: GM-CSF is being used as inhalational therapy on an experimental basis and perhaps this is the route to pursue given the lack of improvement with lung lavage. This would direct the treatment to the site of the disease and avoid systemic toxicity and side effects.
The possibility of lung transplant was also raised since that may lead to cure of PAP. It is uncertain whether this patient has a congenital heterozygous form of surfactant deficiency given her extensive neonatal problems or whether this is truly acquired PAP. However, one has to weigh the risks and benefits of lung transplantation in the context of her current disease and quality of life. In summary, case highlights some specific clinical issues surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary alveolar proteinosis.
Special thanks to Dr. Alfred Pinto for the pathology slides.
THANK YOU FOR JOINING US FOR THE CROSS-CANADA PAEDIATRIC RESPIRATORY ROUNDS. HOPE TO SEE YOU NEXT TIME.
Thank you to AstraZeneca for their support of this program and website.